The chapter’s point is the gap. The translation does not hunt for a synonym. It keeps the word and teaches it. That is a lexical gap being handled, not a failure to handle one.
Milan Kundera, The Book of Laughter and Forgetting. In the English text he presents the Czech word as having no exact translation, and defines it as a state of torment created by the sudden sight of one’s own misery.
Where the line breaks
Alignment of litost into 4 lanes. Arrives, thins, and breaks are written in each cell. The same information is in the text alternative below.
CSParts
litostThe noun
the definitionHow the gap is crossed
CSSourcelitost
litostSource
the definitionSource
ENEnglishPublished translationlitost
litostBreaksLexical gap
defined in the chapterArrives
Published translation. The English text of the novel keeps the Czech word and defines it. The definition English readers quote is the translation’s wording, not a sentence reproduced here from the Czech.
FRFrenchGloss for this platelitost
litostBreaksLexical gap
a definitionArrives
Gloss for this plate. Not a quotation from a particular French edition. The claim is lexical: French has no established equivalent, so a translation has to keep the word or write a definition. Kundera lived in France and supervised French versions of his work; this lane does not cite one.
DEGermanGloss for this platelitost
litostBreaksLexical gap
a definitionArrives
Gloss for this plate. A lexical claim, not a quotation from a German edition.
ESSpanishGloss for this platelitost
litostBreaksLexical gap
a definitionArrives
Gloss for this plate. A lexical claim, not a quotation from a Spanish edition.
Text alternative
English “litost” (published translation): breaks: lexical gap. French “litost” (gloss for this plate): breaks: lexical gap. German “litost” (gloss for this plate): breaks: lexical gap. Spanish “litost” (gloss for this plate): breaks: lexical gap.
litostThe noun
A Czech feeling-word. In the novel’s English text: torment at the sudden sight of one’s own misery. Kundera also ties it to a movement of revenge, the wish to make someone else feel it too.
What happens to “litost” in each lane
Lane
Form
Status
Break
What happens
English
litost
Breaks
Lexical gap
No established English word. The sound is imported. The meaning is not in the lexicon until the next sentences put it there.
French
litost
Breaks
Lexical gap
No conventional French equivalent.
German
litost
Breaks
Lexical gap
No conventional German equivalent. Sehnsucht and Mitleid cover neighboring ground and not this sudden self-wounding.
Spanish
litost
Breaks
Lexical gap
No conventional Spanish equivalent.
the definitionHow the gap is crossed
The word is kept, then defined in the target language. The meaning arrives as instruction, not as a pre-existing dictionary entry.
What happens to “the definition” in each lane
Lane
Form
Status
Break
What happens
English
defined in the chapter
Arrives
—
The gap is crossed by explanation. A reader of the translation does not leave without the sense. They leave having been taught a word.
French
a definition
Arrives
—
The only accurate crossing is to teach the word.
German
a definition
Arrives
—
The crossing is instructional.
Spanish
a definition
Arrives
—
The crossing is instructional.
The joint
Kundera’s chapter exists to say that litost does not already mean something in other languages. In the English text, the definition is a state of torment created by the sudden sight of one’s own misery. He then shows the feeling turning outward, toward making another person miserable too. The definition is the translation. There is no hidden synonym waiting offstage.
That is what a lexical gap looks like when a writer is honest about it. The lane marked “breaks” is the missing dictionary word. The lane marked “arrives” is the paragraph that teaches it. Both are part of the same crossing. A map that showed only the hole would be repeating the romance of the unsayable. The book says it, at the length it needs.
French, German, and Spanish are marked here as glosses of the lexical fact, not as editions collated for this plate. The claim is modest: none of those languages has a conventional noun that already means what Kundera spends a chapter meaning. If a given edition handles the paragraph differently, the chapter is still doing definitional work.
Why this break matters to a reader
A reader who skips the definition and treats litost as “sadness” has dropped the suddenness, the self-regard, and the revenge. A reader who takes the definition has the concept, in English, for the rest of the book. The untranslatable word, in this case, is a device. Kundera uses the gap as a scene. Translating him well means leaving the gap visible and then filling it in public.