The joint
Schaden is harm. Freude is joy. The compound is a kind of joy, and a German reader can see the two halves. That transparency is the interesting part, not a mist around an unsayable emotion. The emotion is sayable. Several languages had already said it before English borrowed the German.
English now has schadenfreude as a dictionary word. Borrowing filled the gap and threw away the joints. You cannot hear “harm” or “joy” unless someone teaches you the German. French joie maligne says malicious joy, which adds a moral adjective the compound does not require. The pleasure at a rival’s small failure is not always “malignant.” It is still Schadenfreude.
Chinese 幸灾乐祸 is the correction to the meme. Four characters, two verbs of pleasure and two nouns of disaster. The sense is there, by the mechanism of a chengyu, which is citation-compression rather than compounding. Japanese does not use a matching compound; it has a proverb, 他人の不幸は蜜の味, other people’s misfortune is the taste of honey. Spanish says it with a clause, alegrarse del mal ajeno. The lexical gap is real for Spanish as a gap in the noun inventory. It is not a gap in the language’s ability to notice the feeling.
Why this break matters to a reader
A reader who is told that German has a word for this, and that their language has none, is being sold a story about souls. A reader of this plate is being shown packaging. English imported an opaque label. Chinese had a proverb-idiom. Japanese had a proverb about honey. The feeling is common. The crate differs. If you need the German joints, you have to open the word, not pretend the feeling begins at the Rhine.